On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Chris Larson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Koen Kooi <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Currently kernel.bbclass splits and renames modules into >> kernel-module-<foo>, but module.bbclass doesn't. What's your opinion on >> making modules.bbclass follow the same logic for consistency? >> To make upgrade paths work the 'kernel-modules' metapackage would be >> ${PN} for external modules. >> > > This sounds like a very good idea to me, it would make the package list much > more consistent and improve the user experience, imo.
yes I agree fully. Will there be issues with upgrades ? > -- > Christopher Larson > clarson at kergoth dot com > Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus > Maintainer - Tslib > Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
