On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/11/3 Khem Raj <[email protected]>: > >> >> yes a more detailed solution is better. you have to go through the >> configure of every >> package and understand the behavior then act upon. As I said before >> its a tedious task >> > I'm well aware of this. That is also why in the infrastructure thread > I suggested using automated testing to find misbehaving packages. > > Btw there are 355 .inc files that contain the word autotools and 1899 .bb > files. > Of course there are lots of dups in there. > And maybe for the base recipes we can convince the yocto people that > this is a serious QA issue (and they have some people employed to work > on this if I understood properly). >
numbers means not so much when it comes down to this. I don't know if any distribution that even does that so I take comfort in everyone being wrong. > Frans > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
