2010/11/22 Graham Gower <[email protected]>:
>
> The conditional call of do_fetch is probably what we want, but I'd
> prefer to see this race fixed before we do that to ensure we aren't
> masking any other related races.
There should definitely be a dependency on the stamp and if the stamp
is newer the fetch should not be called (or generated)
>
>> Why is do_fetch called twice in the first place. I would expect this
>> not to happen.
>
> See src_distribute.bbclass and refer to do_distribute_sources().
> do_fetch is only called twice if pstaging is disabled (which is not
> the default).
Without too much knowledge on the internals, I'd say the 2nd fetch
should be conditional on pstaging then.
Did a quick peek at that bbclass file:
addtask distribute_sources before do_build after do_fetch
python do_distribute_sources () {
bb.build.exec_func("do_fetch", d)
This greatly puzzles me. distribute_sources comes after do_fetch and
it starts doing a do_fetch ???
Isn't it possible to just eliminate this 2nd fetch ???
Puzzled. Frans
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
