My main comment here is that these patches might be better in a different order. Currently if they were applied one at a time they would fail because of the dependency order. I would suggest re-ordering the existing patches into the following order:
0005 0006 0004 0003 0002 0001 Sorry that I didn't notice this the first time I looked at these patches. > -----Original Message----- > From: Melissa Watkins [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 9:41 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Watkins, Melissa; Maupin, Chase > Subject: [PATCH 6/6] defconfig: Add omapl138 defconfig file > > * Add defconfig file for omapl138 machines > > Signed-off-by: Melissa Watkins <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Chase Maupin <[email protected]> > --- > recipes/linux/linux-davinci/omapl138/defconfig | 8 +++++++- > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux-davinci/omapl138/defconfig > b/recipes/linux/linux-davinci/omapl138/defconfig > index 8462139..ad52484 100644 > --- a/recipes/linux/linux-davinci/omapl138/defconfig > +++ b/recipes/linux/linux-davinci/omapl138/defconfig > @@ -1383,6 +1383,7 @@ CONFIG_USB_MUSB_HDRC=y > CONFIG_USB_MUSB_SOC=y > CONFIG_USB_MUSB_HOST=y > # CONFIG_USB_MUSB_PERIPHERAL is not set > +# CONFIG_USB_MUSB_DUAL_ROLE is not set > # CONFIG_USB_MUSB_OTG is not set > CONFIG_USB_MUSB_HDRC_HCD=y > # CONFIG_MUSB_PIO_ONLY is not set > @@ -1557,7 +1558,12 @@ CONFIG_RTC_INTF_DEV=y > CONFIG_RTC_DRV_OMAP=y > # CONFIG_DMADEVICES is not set > # CONFIG_AUXDISPLAY is not set > -# CONFIG_UIO is not set > +CONFIG_UIO=y > +# CONFIG_UIO_PDRV is not set > +# CONFIG_UIO_PDRV_GENIRQ is not set > +# CONFIG_UIO_SMX is not set > +# CONFIG_UIO_SERCOS3 is not set > +CONFIG_UIO_PRUSS=m > > # > # TI VLYNQ > -- > 1.7.0.4 _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
