Am Montag, den 13.12.2010, 12:02 -0800 schrieb Khem Raj:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Paul Menzel
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > searched for `libtool-update.patch`
> >
> >        $ git grep libtool-update.patch
> >        recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb:     
> > $...@['file://libtool-update.patch','file://libtool-2.4-update.patch'][bb.data.getVar('LIBTOOL_HAS_SYSROOT',
> >  d, 1) == 'yes']} \
> >
> > So I am quite confused why the task `patch` wants to apply something
> > from a different recipe.
> 
> It should not. It was an oversight libtool-update.patch is not needed for 2.21

I know and it is not present in `binutils_2.21.bb`. But it gets picked
up anyway.


Thanks,

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Reply via email to