On 24 December 2010 15:11, Graham Gower <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24 December 2010 15:10, Graham Gower <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 24 December 2010 14:24, Michael Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Fri, 24 Dec 2010, Graham Gower wrote: >>> >>>> micro-uclibc/micro-image with udev 124 = 957207 bytes. >>>> micro-uclibc/micro-image with udev 162 = 2303604 bytes. >>> >>> Could you be convinced to try udev 141? When I build it, its only >>> runtime dependencies are glibc and libvolume-id. >> >> I'll do some testing with 124. > > Miscommunication between brain and keyboard. I meant, i'll test 141. >
Well udev 141 seems to work ok, but micro-uclibc/micro-image is 100k bigger, at 1069155 bytes. Perhaps IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER = "busybox-mdev" should be a distro policy for one or both of the micros. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
