On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/12/31 Khem Raj <[email protected]>: >> I thought it was preferred for some machine. Whats the use of a DP=-1 >> recipe? So you intend to use it. > > Yes. a DP=1 for pandaboard is added in the next patch.
ok > I wanted to separate adding the recipe and enabling it for pandaboard > (as I figured the latter might raise some controversy). > I can also imagine other machines can use this (I need to check if it > is good enough for kirkwood based hardware and I need some more > testing for that before I move to this version). > However, I wanted to make this available now, so others can also use it. > > BTW we have plenty of recipes with a DP=-1: > grep DEFAULT_PREFERENCE */* | grep -- -1 | wc > 421 1263 23484 > guess some of them are enabled for specific hw, but several of them > seem to be quite pointless. > E.g. for cups we have 6 recipes: cups_1.1.23.bb cups_1.2.12.bb > cups_1.2.7.bb cups_1.3.8.bb cups_1.4.3.bb cups_1.4.4.bb > The last three have DP -1, none is pinned or has a hw specific DP. yes we should try to reduce them if possible. > > Frans > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
