On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 12:01:24AM +0300, Roman I Khimov wrote: >В сообщении от Понедельник 03 января 2011 23:02:02 автор Bernhard Reutner- >Fischer написал: >> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot....@gmail.com> >> --- >> recipes/busybox/busybox.inc | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> recipes/busybox/busybox_1.1x.inc | 2 ++ >> recipes/busybox/files/passwd | 11 +++++++++++ >> recipes/busybox/files/shadow | 11 +++++++++++ >> 4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 recipes/busybox/files/passwd >> create mode 100644 recipes/busybox/files/shadow > >I don't quite understand why is it needed. We have base-passwd for passwd (and >group) and missing shadow usually is not an issue (if my memory serves me >right, it'll be created on first usage). Then, speaking of base-passwd that >needs to be updated to use alternatives if this goes in.
I intend to use busybox-passwd as replacement for micro-image (will send that as an RFC later tonight). I want micro-image to just contain the bare minimum (and all of it provided by busybox). _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
