On 01/07/2011 10:52 AM, Paul Menzel wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 06.01.2011, 12:48 +0000 schrieb Andreas Oberritter: > > What do you mean by »unconditional SRC_URI_append«? I searched through > the documentation and could not find the word.
Unconditional, because it doesn't contain an override like e.g. SRC_URI_append_beagleboard does. > I always thought > `SRC_URI_append =` and `SRC_URI +=` is the same and if I am not mistaken > the manual says the same [1]. > > Do I understand your patch correctly, that when `_append` was used in > the recipe in some places, the space was missing and that you chose to > replace it by `+=` for consistency? Yes. I think that += is easier to use and less error-prone. - As Koen already pointed out, it adds whitespace automatically, so in whitespace separated lists like SRC_URI you don't have to care. - You can use multiple statements in a recipe. SRC_URI += "foo" SRC_URI += "bar" vs. SRC_URI_append = " foo" SRC_URI_append = " bar" The latter wouldn't work. In the case of gcc, I modified SRC_URI in some inc file resulting in "... file://my.patchfile://fortran-cross-compile-hack.patch ...". > [1] http://docs.openembedded.org/usermanual/usermanual.html#recipes_syntax SRC_URI_append = "file://fixup.patch" is probably a bad example. Regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
