On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 15:30, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >> Maybe it would be better to introduce EGLIBC_FEATURES and >> BUSYBOX_FEATURES, possibly presetting some values with options already >> present in DISTRO_FEATURES. >> > > I think it can get to many knobs and confusion in settings. With > system library any feature en|disable > is system wide so having it as a distro policy is right way to go imo.
We can use DISTRO_EGLIBC_FEATURES or DISTRO_LIBC_FEATURES (so we can add to uclibc support for it too). Spliting it from DISTRO_FEATURES makes sense IMO since we'd use the same concept to recipes (as busybox) that are ofthen customized. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
