On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Koen Kooi <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 20-01-11 19:12, Víctor M. Jáquez L. wrote: >> >> In order to build native-sdk-image recipe, I found my self compiling >> glibc_2.9-r37.4, because it is the real provider of virtual-libc-dev (the >> toolchain does not truly provide it -but that is another bug [1]-). >> >> But the glibc_2.9-r37.4 configuration fails using the canonical >> arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi- toolchain > > If you're using angstrom 2008, glibc 2.9 is built by default. Trying to > rebuild it won't work because it will be missing headers due to all the > - -initial and -intermedia shuffle. > If you're using angstrom 2010, eglibc is built by default and should > providing virtual-libc-dev
yes angstrom-2010.x is a better option keep in mind its new so expect some churn every now and then. > > Switching to minimal will only get you anguish, since it's broken by design. Heh interesting :) It would help if you elaborate on the flaws so we can improve it and in turn improve OE in general > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFNOWfsMkyGM64RGpERAsqfAKC2L5KDSLLBSC0tES2r+Axm+rxGoQCfVssG > IDR7J61eU9hEKOTT2+CRW9M= > =R8yc > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
