2011/2/1 Richard Purdie <[email protected]>: > On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 22:31 +0100, Bernhard Guillon wrote: >> On 01.02.2011 21:08, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> > ... a team that >> > is chosen by the community is much more empowered to make decisions. >> > >> +1 >> >> In my opinion it is very important in the current situation to have a vote. > > Just please keep in mind what this looks like to the outside world. > > So far various amounts of bad timing, unfortunate circumstances and the > rules have meant that 2-4 months on we could appear to be going around > in circles and unlikely to make a "real" decision soon (at least six > weeks for a vote). > > Yocto talks to people commercially and 3-5 months to make some decisions > (not implement, just make the decisions) would be commercial suicide to > a business. > > I accept this takes as long as it takes and I'm not going to even > attempt to rush anything but OE isn't doing its perception much good to > be brutally honest. > > On the plus side I know there are positive moves afoot too so its not > all doom and gloom but its worth keeping the above in mind. > > Cheers, > > Richard > Richard, I agree with you. I feel we could have made more progress, but things take the time they need.
I am not against an interim TSC, but I would like to see some openness of the board on how they feel they should move forward. Guess it'll be after FOSDEM though (if I interpreted Graeme's message properly). I can imagine we do not want to waste another 6 weeks or so on voting for a new TSC, but I think it is desirable that the way forward is clear for and backed by the community. Best regards, Frans. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
