Got an error when sending the message below. Not sure if it made it to the list (gmane does not have it yet), so resending. Apologies if you get this twice.
Frans 2011/2/14 Frans Meulenbroeks <[email protected]>: > 2011/2/14 Steffen Sledz <[email protected]>: >> Am 14.02.2011 09:11, schrieb Frans Meulenbroeks: >>> 2011/2/14 Steffen Sledz <[email protected]>: >>>> While setting up Jenkins/Hudson jobs for the testing-release-2011.03 >>>> branch based on the testscript.sh from the contrib subdir i hit the >>>> following problem. >>>> >>>> bitbake (1.10.2) finally reports "NOTE: Task Summary: Attempted 1217 tasks >>>> of which 0 didn't need to be rerun and 0 failed.". So it seems that the >>>> build was successful. But bitbake did not return 0 but 1. So Jenkins marks >>>> the build as failed. >>>> >>>> I guess the exit code 1 is coming from some QA Issues. How do we handle >>>> that if if my guess is right? >>>> >>>> Do we mark such a build run as successful in our test matrix? >>>> >>>> Has bitbake a defined set of exit codes that we can evaluate in the >>>> testscript.sh? >>>> >>>> Steffen >>> >>> There have been a few threads on this in the past. >>> One of the ways (and maybe the best one) to get around this is to fix >>> the QA errors. >> >> Of course. You are right. >> >> But for the moment the question is: "Do we mark such a builds as successful >> in our test matrix or not?" >> >> Steffen >> > > Personally I'm inclined to say no. Marking them as unsuccessful > increases the chance of getting them fixed. > Then again others may think differently & I don't know exactly how > many QA errors we're talking about. > (I seem to recall that my console-image build had four, for cups I saw > a patch, binutils is being looked at or maybe already resolved by > Khem, no idea about the other two). > > Best regards, Frans. > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
