On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:57 AM, Eric Bénard <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16/02/2011 12:49, Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> Acked-by: Koen Kooi <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> I must admit the busybox churn is getting a bit much, how many days till >> .4? >> > for 1.18 : > 22/11/2010 : 1.18.0 (unstable) > 21/12/2010 : 1.18.1 > 16/01/2011 : 1.18.2 > 08/02/2011 : 1.18.3 > > for 1.17 : > 06/07/2010 : 1.17.0 (unstable) > 25/07/2010 : 1.17.1 > 25/08/2010 : 1.17.2 > 09/10/2010 : 1.17.3 > 22/11/2010 : 1.17.4 > > so we can expect at least a 1.18.4 (as there are fixes for 1.18.3)
I think the nature of releases could affect how we take the recipes in. In this case if it seems busybox has major release like 1.18 and then spins out bugfix releases on top of it. So we might consider having one recipe for 1.18 and then patch it on top as needed and similarly moving forward for 1.19 > > For 1.19, I think I'll wait .2 or .3 before annoying distro maintainers :-) > unless they have feature introduction in minor releases this will be a good solution IMO > Eric > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
