Ping. Is there any reason not to apply this patch? Is there a better way to solve the problem?
On 02/11/2011 02:25 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > On 02/11/2011 02:18 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: >> On 11-02-11 14:02, Andreas Oberritter wrote: >>> * Allow precompiled modules to depend on a specific kernel version. >> >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> classes/kernel.bbclass | 2 +- >>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >>> diff --git a/classes/kernel.bbclass b/classes/kernel.bbclass >>> index 0d1b4ad..55e3ca0 100644 >>> --- a/classes/kernel.bbclass >>> +++ b/classes/kernel.bbclass >>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ >>> inherit linux-kernel-base module_strip >> >>> -PROVIDES += "virtual/kernel" >>> +PROVIDES += "virtual/kernel virtual/kernel-${PV}" >>> DEPENDS += "virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc >>> virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod-${@get_kernelmajorversion('${PV}')} >>> virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc${KERNEL_CCSUFFIX} update-modules >>> bluez-dtl1-workaround" >> >>> # we include gcc above, we dont need virtual/libc >> >> How is PV know before the kernel is built? The line below has a >> workaround for that, so I guess it also needs one in PROVIDES, no? > > KERNEL_VERSION is what's unknown until after the build. PV is the > version set by the recipe. The line below uses PV to derive 2.4 or 2.6 > from that. > > Regards, > Andreas > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
