Hi Martin, On 02/22/2011 09:11 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 07:24:28PM +0100, Andreas Oberritter wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 02/22/2011 06:52 PM, Eric Benard wrote: >>> On 22/02/2011 18:22, Mickael Chazaux wrote: >>>> I have a hard time figuring out why bitbake seems to mix versions of >>>> ppp... Any ideas? >>>> >>> strange, which distro, git tag, bitbake version are you using ? >>> >>> Both bitbake ppp-2.4.5 & bitbake -b >>> openembedded/recipes/ppp/ppp_2.4.5.bb work fine here (angstrom 2008.1, >>> armv5 target, bitbake 1.12.0). >> >> I don't think this has anything to do with ppp. I faced the same issue >> with a local recipe, of which an older version had been built before. >> When packaging, the old version was used. A new workdir was created for >> the old version during this step and the resulting packages were empty. >> No recipe existed for this old version at that time, i.e. PR had already >> been increased to 1.0, but 0.0 was used by bitbake. >> >> In the end, I deleted bitbake's cache and all files matching the >> package's name to get rid of the annoying problem. I think there were >> pstage packages of the old version lying around. > > This wrong behavior is quite common ie after changing PACKAGE_ARCH, see: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04280.html
In that thread, if I understood correctly, Richard suggested that packaged staging could solve the problem. But that doesn't seem to be the case. Do you know why? Regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
