On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 02:40, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote:
> On (23/02/11 13:47), Otavio Salvador wrote:
...
>> I see noone using cmake 2.6.
>>
>> In any case cmake will know the "internal" modules directory by itself
>> so it works even if this value doesn't match. This is where it is
>> going to look as fallback and I was using 2.8 without 2.6 for long
>> time without noticing any issue.
>>
>> This seems safe. We could drop the CMAKE_MODULE_PATH if preferred. I
>> just fixed it to 2.8 to reflect the current default one.
>
> yeah make it portable for future if no one is using cmake 2.6

I did not understand what you meant. You mean to drop CMAKE_MODULE_PATH?

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: [email protected]  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Reply via email to