Hi Phil,

On 07/03/2011 10:57, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 10:50 +0100, Eric Benard wrote:
Hi Khem,

On 06/03/2011 00:08, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Eric Bénard<[email protected]>   wrote:
* 0.53.1 brings some improvements over 0.52 which was released
more than 2 years ago. For more details, check the changelog here :
http://matt.ucc.asn.au/dropbear/CHANGES
* Please note that DROPBEAR_SMALL_CODEis now disabled which may
increase the size of the binaries.

can you compare the sizes of .52 and .53.1 so we know how much it will be

for an armv5 target :
0.53.1 : 228112
0.53.1 + DROPBEAR_SMALL_CODE : 178960
0.52 : 183008

Looks like DROPBEAR_SMALL_CODE is still worth having then.  Why was it
disabled?

the changelog doesn't say it but the comment in option.h says :
/* Set this if you want to use the DROPBEAR_SMALL_CODE option. This can save
several kB in binary size, however will make the symmetrical ciphers (AES, DES
etc) slower (perhaps by 50%). Recommended for most small systems. */

so maybe they prefered to get performance by default instead of saving 50kB.

We can keep this option by adding this to the recipe :
+do_configure_prepend() {
+       echo "#define DROPBEAR_SMALL_CODE" >>${S}/options.h
+}
+

Eric

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Reply via email to