-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08-03-11 12:49, Steffen Sledz wrote: > Am 07.03.2011 18:59, schrieb Tom Rini: >> On 03/07/2011 09:57 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: >>> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 17:43 +0100, Steffen Sledz wrote: >>>> --- a/recipes/upnp/gupnp_0.13.4.bb >>>> +++ b/recipes/upnp/gupnp_0.13.4.bb >>>> @@ -2,13 +2,14 @@ LICENSE = "LGPL" >>>> DEPENDS = "e2fsprogs gssdp libsoup-2.4 libxml2 gtk-doc-native libgee" >>>> >>>> require gupnp.inc >>>> +PR = "1" >> >> "r1" >> >>>> >>>> SRC_URI[md5sum] = "0d562f5f02534c70c3743b2c514db8ba" >>>> SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >>>> "7974953f38a41236c875c3df509abc43e8218b5925fdc18212a73b1ae0d0e7e8" >>>> >>>> inherit autotools pkgconfig >>>> >>>> -EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-gtk-doc" >>>> +EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-gtk-doc --enable-introspection=no" >>> >>> I can't help thinking that there must be a better place to put this, >>> maybe even autotools.bbclass. We basically want those options for all >>> packages that will take them, right? >> >> Usually this is just in "gnome" stuff and gnome or gnomebase does handle >> this. But indeed, perhaps this is something that should be more widely >> passed in to avoid semi-random breakage. > > Can i get some acks for my patch at least as an interim solution? Currently > the build is broken! This really is a blocker. :(
NAK, fix the PRs first -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFNdh0YMkyGM64RGpERArXvAJ4yt7VoI/RK4hA6cvmx5ReKJY9HdgCfTcEv iTy/5tw2fyZNUrND8EU0U8Y= =JAUx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
