Hello. On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 10:05, Koen Kooi wrote: > On 11-03-11 09:19, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > > > This topic has come up several times now and it did come up again during a > > TSC > > meeting yesterday. > > > > It feels like the current OE bugzilla is not in really good shape. The > > question > > is how we are going to handle this. On the one hand it might be good to > > remove > > as it holds a lot outdated informations and it seems developers are not > > using it > > at all. > > > > On the other hand this would cut off a service for atcual users of OE. > > > > If we can find a group of people that is willing to clean the current > > bugzilla > > up improve it and make sure that problems in it are actually worked on it > > still > > have a chance to stay. We need a clear maintainership for it and bugs need > > atcually be worked. > > > > Comments? Volunteers? > > Just kill it already, for OE-core we can use the yocto bugzilla which > has dedicated maintainers.
That leaves still a big part of the metadat without bugzilla coverage. meta-openembedded. If we find a group of people maintaining it I don't see a problem with the OE bugzilla to stay. regards Stefan Schmidt _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
