-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 17-03-11 15:52, Graeme Gregory wrote: > On 17/03/2011 14:43, Esben Haabendal wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 11:18 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote: >>>> I am still very much interested in discussing how to move this >>>> technology from OE-lite to OE, but as it impacts all recipe metadata >>>> (build dependencies has to be redefined), OE community at a large >>> really >>>> needs to value the benefits of solving this problem. >>> The benefits of solving the problem are clearly very great, but I >>> don't think OE itself is really in a position to embrace a "big bang" >>> kind of change which would require redefining all the build >>> dependencies. I think we need to find a technological solution which >>> will work with our current DEPENDS scheme. >> I know that this seems to be the general consensus in OE, but I do not >> agree with it. Sometimes architectural work requires working out the >> details on a branch, and then when it is mostly done, do the "big bang" >> which will then not really be that "big" anymore, as most of the issues >> have been resolved. >> >> Is OE really in a position to permantly settle for something suboptimal >> in such a central area? >> > I would suggest a branch of oe-core is the ideal place to do this work. > It can be proved on oe-core then rolled out to meta-oe at a later date.
OE-core already features per-machine sysroots, so the main problem we had, relocatability, has already been solved. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFNgielMkyGM64RGpERAqcIAKCyT44a9MzDF+esO6DgRbtBXi4L8ACdGzpN 4vN5d5EtUwbo3cNHfMl9XQ4= =eFCq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
