On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 08:57 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2011/3/17 Richard Purdie <[email protected]>: > > On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 19:10 +0100, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > >> I'm in favor of keeping it, cleaning it up, and improve > >> the integration with patchwork / git. Throwing it away > >> would be a very bad sign to all those countless people > >> who've gone through the pains of actually working with > >> the bugtracker. > > > > The simple question is who is actually going to sort out the mess its > > in? > > > > Who is going to look after it on a continuing basis? > > > > If there isn't ownership, nothing is going to change. > > Actually I feel the real problem is that: > - people did not want to get bugs assigned to them (at least that was > what someone told me in the past) > - we're lacking a good notion of package or recipe ownership, so even > if we had someone acting as a bug manager, (s)he would have a hard > time to find out who to assign an issue to.
Yes, agreed. A few people have tried in the past to take responsibility for bugzilla itself (in infrastructure terms) and I would be happy enough to do that for the future. But it clearly is not reasonable to expect the Bugzilla maintainer(s) to be personally responsible for fixing every bug that gets reported. Unless other developers are cooperative, this leads inevitably to the current situation of issues languishing in bugzilla forever. As you say, the real issue here seems to be that someone (presumably the TSC) needs to determine the workflow that OE is going to use and then convince the developers to stick to it. Bugzilla works most effectively if everything goes through it, which means you can use the bug list as a kind of dashboard showing the issues which need attention each day, and if everybody uses it (and hence is diligent about closing bugs once they are actually fixed). To that extent its role overlaps somewhat with patchwork and, personally, I would be quite happy to see bugzilla replace patchwork for email submissions. But clearly others have a different view on that and, again, it is probably going to be down to the TSC to decide what tools are right for OE. p. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
