On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 21:33 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2011/3/18 Dr. Michael Lauer <[email protected]>: > > Salut, > > > > the blacklisting of packages as found in angstrom.bbclass > > is pretty helpful and would be beneficial to all kinds > > of distribution configurations in OE. Would there be > > a strong objection of renaming this to blacklist.bbclass? > > > > Copying, of course, is also a possibility, but > > in my opinion it would only be the second best choice. > > > > Cheers, > > > > :M: > > If blacklisting a certain package for all distro's is there then still > a need to keep those blacklisted packages ????
The class that Mickey is talking about is just the mechanism to allow blacklisting. It doesn't actually contain a list of blacklisted packages; I think that typically goes in DISTRO.conf for distros that use it. However, if we do want to rename it to something more global (which I agree seems like a good idea) then the contents would need a bit of tweaking since both the variables that it looks at, and the messages that it outputs, make reference to Angstrom specifically. p. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
