* suggested by kergoth on #oe as response to similar patch limited to gtk+ http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2011-March/031074.html 15:03 < kergoth_> JaMa: pretty sure we just need PACKAGES_DYNAMIC = "" and PACKAGES_DYNAMIC_virtclass-native = "" in native.bbclass. everyone i've talked to so far as agreed that it's a sane approach, including RP.
* otherwise couple of errors like this are shown NOTE: multiple providers are available for runtime gdk-pixbuf-loader-gif (gtk+-native, gtk+, gtk+-fastscaling) NOTE: consider defining a PREFERRED_PROVIDER entry to match gdk-pixbuf-loader-gif ERROR: Trying to resolve runtime dependency gdk-pixbuf-loader-xpm resulted in conflicting PREFERRED_PROVIDER entries being found. The providers found were: ['/OE/dev/recipes/gtk+/gtk+_2.20.1.bb', 'virtual:native:/OE/dev/recipes/gtk+/gtk+_2.20.0.bb'] The PREFERRED_PROVIDER entries resulting in this conflict were: ['PREFERRED_PROVIDER_gtk+ = gtk+', 'PREFERRED_PROVIDER_gdk-pixbuf-csource-native = gtk+-native'] Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]> --- classes/native.bbclass | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/classes/native.bbclass b/classes/native.bbclass index b8a792f..1e7a6ec 100644 --- a/classes/native.bbclass +++ b/classes/native.bbclass @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ EXCLUDE_FROM_WORLD = "1" PACKAGES = "" PACKAGES_virtclass-native = "" +PACKAGES_DYNAMIC = "" +PACKAGES_DYNAMIC_virtclass-native = "" PACKAGE_ARCH = "${BUILD_ARCH}" BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH = "${BUILD_ARCH}" -- 1.7.4.1 _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
