On 03/24/2011 05:00 PM, Michael Smith wrote: > Andreas Oberritter wrote: >> how about this solution? For MACHINE_KERNEL_PR = "r11" and PR = "r20" it >> creates PR = "r11.20", to mimic the revision numbers commonly seen with >> recipes using INC_PR. > > I'd rather see PR before MACHINE_KERNEL_PR as PR seems more "major". But > like either way better than the current situation.
Actually, that's what I'd prefer, too. But I wanted to provide a seamless upgrade path, as suggested by Frans. I'm just starting to use MACHINE_KERNEL_PR, so for me there would be no big difference either way. One minor thing: If MACHINE_KERNEL_PR comes last, then MACHINE_KERNEL_PR_append_local will IMO yield a nicer result. In the meantime, I've sent an updated patch, moving the code to its own bbclass file. Regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
