-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04-04-11 17:14, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > On 04/04/2011 03:58 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: >> On 04-04-11 15:00, Andreas Oberritter wrote: >>> Ping. Any votes for or against this patch with either appended or >>> prepended PR? >> >> I don't like this patch *at all*. Recipes can already do >> MACHINE_KERNEL_PR_append = "something" if they need to. > > The use of MACHINE_KERNEL_PR is optional, so it feels really wrong to > append something to it in a recipe. > >> Can you should me a specific example on how this would be an improvement? > > With the version below. a distro can start to use MACHINE_KERNEL_PR any > time without breaking updates. > > The vast majority of modules do not use MACHINE_KERNEL_PR
It seems you don't understand how MACHINE_KERNEL_PR works. The *machine* sets it. The distro has *no* say in it. Therefore the module recipes don't need to set it, since it's automatic. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFNmgXgMkyGM64RGpERAr9CAJ9urNa16wfGmCwh4/NvUZd4GOUm2wCfcCrV Q4CvioBpYYMC4bjEHL4cUD0= =t85H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
