Dear Ludovic,
Am Dienstag, den 31.05.2011, 09:08 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Desroches: > On 5/30/2011 9:04 PM, Paul Menzel wrote: > > From: Ludovic Desroches<[email protected]> > > Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 18:43:14 +0200 > > > > Build tested > > • with task-base image with the tiobench package on atmel boards by Ludovic > > Desroches and > > • using `angstrom-2010.x` and `minimal{,-uclibc}` for `MACHINE = > > "beagleboard"` by Paul Menzel. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches<[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel<[email protected]> > > --- > > v2 → v3 > > • sort dependencies > > • update `LICENSE` > > • remove overrides, which are the defaults > > • use ${PN} and ${P} > > • rename directory for the patch > > > > Ludovic, could you please test the updated patch and tell me if you send > > the Makefile patch upstream. > No problem, it is still ok. Thanks for your help. It's good for me to > see how this recipe has to look like since we can find different ways > into other (maybe old) recipes. I confess I have seen some of the > changes you asked but I forget them! > > I have not sent the Makefile patch upstream, since the last release is > quite old, I don't know the project is still active. It does not look like that. Looking at the CVS log it seems like tiobench 0.4.1 should have been released somehow. Anyhow, it never hurts to send the patch to the author mentioned in `README`. I will commit your patch probably tomorrow to give others time for comments. Thanks, Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
