On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 13:49, Koen Kooi <[email protected]> wrote: >> Can you describe a use case? > > Rolling out a fix for the generic package without having to rebuild it N > times.
When doing this fix you should bump PR, right? in this case, this will be (or ought to be) rebuild for all machines thus for me seems it will be the same end result. The only use case I see is very risky since it fully depends on the developper to know which machine it needs to be build to and like. This IMO is wrong and the risk of forget a need rebuild is bigger then the reduction of build and cpu cycles. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
