On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Noor, Ahsan <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Noor Ahsan <[email protected]>
>
> * Added recipe file to build 3.0-a9 version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Noor Ahsan <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../lmbench-3.0-a9/update-results-script.patch | 155
> ++++++++++++++++++++
> meta-oe/recipes-support/lmbench/lmbench_3.0-a9.bb | 75 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
> a/meta-oe/recipes-support/lmbench/lmbench-3.0-a9/update-results-script.patch
> b/meta-oe/recipes-support/lmbench/lmbench-3.0-a9/update-results-script.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..3feb657
> --- /dev/null
> +++
> b/meta-oe/recipes-support/lmbench/lmbench-3.0-a9/update-results-script.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
> +Now that we have our binaries in /usr/bin rather than the normal
> +lmbench hierarchy we need to update the scripts as well to bave well here.
There's now a defined patch header, please update to this.
> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/lmbench/lmbench_3.0-a9.bb
> b/meta-oe/recipes-support/lmbench/lmbench_3.0-a9.bb
[snip]
> +python do_unpack () {
> + bb.build.exec_func('base_do_unpack', d)
> + bb.build.exec_func('byebk_do_unpack', d)
> +}
> +
> +byebk_do_unpack () {
> + find ${S}/.. -name BitKeeper -o -name SCCS | xargs rm -rf
> +}
All of this, I believe, dates back to when OE was in BK and that could
be problematic, we should drop this now I think.
Thanks!
--
Tom
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
