On (18/10/11 23:42), Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 02:36:35PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On (18/10/11 23:10), Martin Jansa wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:49:54PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > On (18/10/11 22:38), Martin Jansa wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:32:13AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks to Khem the patchwork hooks for meta-oe (and hence meta-efl, > > > > > > meta-gnome and meta-xfce) are active and working. > > > > > > Once the commits hit the OE server the state will get updated > > > > > > automatically, > > > > > > so the submitter will instantly know when his/her patch has hit the > > > > > > repo. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > There is known and fixed issue with patchwork breaking author name > > > > > > > > > > We have an example in patch > > > > > "[meta-oe] lightmediascanner: Add version 0.4.4 (initial recipe)" > > > > > Original e-mail says "Pau Espin Pedrol <pespin.shar at gmail.com>" > > > > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2011-October/035644.html > > > > > > > > > > older patchwork instance says only "pespin <pespin.shar at gmail.com>" > > > > > http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/13323/ > > > > > newer patchwork instance says also "pespin <pespin.shar at gmail.com>" > > > > > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/13323/ > > > > > > > > > > Same problem was reported also on LKML > > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/18/128 > > > > > And later fixed by Jeremy Kerr > > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/18/149 > > > > > > > > > > Can we get this upstream fix to our patchwork instance too? > > > > > > > > This patch is already applied to the new patchwork instance on > > > > patchwork.openembedded.org however it was only yesterday when it came > > > > into life. > > > > > > But still it doesn't work today: > > > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/13437/ > > > > > > and from Kerr's reply I'm not sure if someone has to fix something in > > > patchwork database or if registered users can fix it in their profile > > > page.. or maybe he fixed only Submitter fields for existing patches in > > > database.. > > > > yes the user profile for existing users have to be updated which I have > > done for Pau now. So it should be ok. Please re-check the patchwork. > > Almost :), there is missing 'l' > From: Pau Espin Pedro > From: Pau Espin Pedrol >
sorry about that glitch should be ok now. > Is it possible for registred patchwork user to update it or do we need > to ask you when we found similar issue for someone else? Once registered it does not let the user change it. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
