2011/10/31 Koen Kooi <[email protected]> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Op 31-10-11 22:18, Philip Balister schreef: > > On 10/31/2011 01:48 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> Op 31-10-11 17:24, Paul Menzel schreef: > >>> Am Montag, den 31.10.2011, 11:50 +0100 schrieb Koen Kooi: > >>>> Op 29-10-11 14:33, Paul Menzel schreef: > >>>>> Dear Martin, dear Denis, > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Am Samstag, den 29.10.2011, 12:29 +0200 schrieb Martin Jansa: > >>>>>> From: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <[email protected]> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Added LIC_FILES_CHKSUM, and fixed LICENSE > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <[email protected]> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]> > >>>>> > >>>>> NACK. > >>>>> > >>>>> please add the version you import and the commit ID you import > >>>>> from. This is all written in the guide lines [1]! > >>>> > >>>> And as I've said before, meta-oe is not oe-dev, so you can't use > >>>> take the old 'rules' and apply them to meta-oe 1:1! > >> > >>> The guide lines I referred to [1] have been written for OE-core. ;-) > >> > >> Yes, and oe-core still isn't meta-oe > > > > Why would we need different guidelines? > > Different goals I guess. And I don't trust a ruleset that's in a wiki, too > much room for people coming in and messing it up. > > As far as I recall the idea was that meta oe should follow the same guidelines as oe core. When was this changed? Who decided this? And if there need to be different guidelines, I feel it is useful to document them somewhere (and probably also why it deviates from oe-core).
Anyway, I think I start to understand why so few people are willing to contribute to meta-oe. Have fun! Frans. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
