On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Koen Kooi <[email protected]>wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Op 03-11-11 10:09, Andrea Adami schreef: > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Koen Kooi > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > Op 02-11-11 22:00, Paul Eggleton schreef: > >>>> On Monday 17 October 2011 01:26:50 Andrea Adami wrote: > >>>>> * For some reasons when the cache is created root can still be ro > >>>>> * and as solution you would be obliged to add 'rw' to your > >>>>> commandline. * There are patches in openembedded-classic to > >>>>> correct this * (and those are still pending for meta-oe). * Until > >>>>> a solution is found disable the creation of the device cache on > >>>>> boot. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrea Adami <[email protected]> --- > >>>>> recipes-core/udev/udev/default | 4 ++++ > >>>>> recipes-core/udev/udev_173.bbappend | 1 + 2 files changed, 5 > >>>>> insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 > >>>>> recipes-core/udev/udev/default create mode 100644 > >>>>> recipes-core/udev/udev_173.bbappend > >>>>> > >>>>> diff --git a/recipes-core/udev/udev/default > >>>>> b/recipes-core/udev/udev/default new file mode 100644 index > >>>>> 0000000..ba2867e --- /dev/null +++ > >>>>> b/recipes-core/udev/udev/default @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +# Default for > >>>>> /etc/init.d/udev + +# Uncomment this out to enable device cache > >>>>> +#DEVCACHE="/etc/dev.tar" diff --git > >>>>> a/recipes-core/udev/udev_173.bbappend > >>>>> b/recipes-core/udev/udev_173.bbappend new file mode 100644 index > >>>>> 0000000..72d991c --- /dev/null +++ > >>>>> b/recipes-core/udev/udev_173.bbappend @@ -0,0 +1 @@ > >>>>> +FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}:" > >>>> > >>>> I think this is going to cause problems for distros such as > >>>> Angstrom that enable this layer without always using it. Can we > >>>> just disable the dev cache for the machines in meta-handheld? > > > > Or get with the program and use udev 174 with systemd, no need for a > > device cache in that case! > > > > regards, > > > > Koen > > > > > >> Sure, this is the future...but for now oe-core doesn't implement > >> systemd as default. > > Nor does it have udev 173. You can't argue that oe-core doesn't have > something that's in meta-oe when you're already relying on meta-oe. > Heh, I'm 'unfortunately' obliged to include meta-oe even if I want to build a core-image-minimal for the machines in meta-handheld. The problem is there are two sets of udev recipes! There should be one, only one layer containing core packages. I understand this is problematic and that Angstrom is already testing systemd, still we should focus and find a concrete proposal for merging with oe-core asap! Cheers Andrea _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
