* Koen Kooi <[email protected]> [111110 11:21]:
> Op 10-11-11 10:47, Paul Eggleton schreef:
> > On Thursday 10 November 2011 08:47:17 Anders Darander wrote:
> >> * Andreas Müller <[email protected]> [111109 23:17]:
> >>> Imagine a recipe is included into an image by a task and later gets
> >>> systemd- native support. How about forcing the packages in
> >>> SYSTEMD_PACKAGES packed into images in case
> >>> IMAGE_INIT_MANAGER = "systemd"
> >>> is found in the image definition?
> >> Sure, that sounds like a nice idea. Although, in that case, SysV-init
> >> files should probably also be packaged in separate packages and be
> >> installed in a similar manner.
> > Why are we going to such an effort to provide both sysvinit and systemd
> > in the same distro? Why not make it a distro policy decision? This would
> > save a huge amount of work.
> So I can start sending patches to add the systemd files to ${PN} in oe-core
> recipes now? That's the big hold up: lack of vision from the OE-core folks.
Why not, it'd be nice to not have to install a bunch of extra packages
just to get the systemd files installed. (OTOH, no big deal, but then we
also could consider splitting out the SysV-init-files...)
And we should also move systemd into oe-core. That's atleast my wish...
/Anders
--
Anders Darander
ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
