On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:18:17AM +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Friday 18 November 2011 10:55:03 Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 01:36:07AM +0100, Andrea Adami wrote: > > > * for our old beloved handhelds the kernel > > > > I'm using it.. but if I'm alone then I can keep it in my own branch.. > > currently upgrading from 3.1.0-rc10 to 3.2.0-rc2 > > If you're still using it Martin I'd rather keep it around than force you to > maintain your own branch with it in; it shouldn't get in the way of anyone > else.
Well, it doesn't cost me anything to maintain it and if nobody booted 3.1.0-rc* from that recipe except me then I'm fine with dropping it. But I rememeber a while back when we were trying to boot something like 2.6.32-rcX and we had to exchange few patches and defconfigs to find usable configuration and meta-handheld looks like good place to share such stuff if it at least work for someone (in this case me), but no other side I do not send patch with every SRCREV change I have locally unless it needs defconfig change or extra patch (expecting that everybody can bump SRCREV and rcX locally to test newer version). like this: https://gitorious.org/shr/meta-handheld/commit/5136fd456569a254b3203545af3c98d643e8b681?format=patch Regards, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
