I have sent an email to [email protected] to query the appropriate license type yesterday and not response.
I'd like to adopt following option, does it make sense? > > 2. We'll need to add a Netperf license to common-licenses and set LICENSE = > > "Netperf" Best Regards, Zhenhua > -----Original Message----- > From: Luo Zhenhua-B19537 > Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 10:32 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [oe] [PATCH meta-oe 5/9] nerperf: add > > Thanks for the feedback. > > I saw netperf is licensed under "netperf" in oe > http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/plain/recipes/netperf/netperf_2.4.4.bb. > > Anyway, I will send an email to the author to query about the license type. > > > Best Regards, > > Zhenhua > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Flanagan, Elizabeth [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 6:32 AM > > To: [email protected]; Luo Zhenhua-B19537 > > Subject: Re: [oe] [PATCH meta-oe 5/9] nerperf: add > > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On (16/12/11 10:22), Koen Kooi wrote: > > >> > > >> Op 16 dec. 2011, om 10:19 heeft Luo Zhenhua-B19537 het volgende > > >> geschreven: > > >> > > >> > Hello Koen, > > >> > > > >> >> -----Original Message----- > > >> >> From: [email protected] > > >> >> [mailto:openembedded- [email protected]] On > > >> >> Behalf Of Koen Kooi > > >> >> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 3:52 PM > > >> >> > > >> >>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/netperf/netperf_2.4.4.bb @@ > > >> >>> +++ -0,0 > > >> >>> +++ +1,47 > > >> >>> @@ +DESCRIPTION="Network performance benchmark including tests > > >> >>> for TCP, UDP, sockets, ATM and more." +SECTION = "console/network" > > >> >>> +HOMEPAGE = "http://www.netperf.org/"; +LICENSE = "netperf" > > >> >> > > >> >> Can you include a comment on what type of license netperf is? > > >> >> MIT like, BSD like, GPL like? > > >> > [Luo Zhenhua-B19537] May I know which license type should be with > > >> > following > > COPYING content? > > >> > > >> That looks like a BSD or MIT derivative, maybe Beth can give us > > >> some guidance on what to use as LICENSE > > > > > > it says "for non-commercial purposes only" > > > > Yeah.... in this case, I would do one of two things (and I have a > > feeling one will be more valid that the other): > > > > 1. Email the author and see if we can use BSD-4-Clause. My guess is no. > > 2. We'll need to add a Netperf license to common-licenses and set > > LICENSE = "Netperf" > > > > I've checked the openSuSE Build Service and they have this as an > > "Other" license, so, check with the author first, but be prepared to > > add Netperf to the common- licenses directory. > > > > And yes, Koen is right. I wouldn't use BSD or MIT for this, > > specifically because of the non-commercial clause in (ii). > > > > -b > > > > > > > >> > > >> regards, > > >> > > >> Koen > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > Copyright (C) 1993 Hewlett-Packard Company > > >> > ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. > > >> > > > >> > The enclosed software and documentation includes copyrighted > > >> > works > > >> > of Hewlett-Packard Co. For as long as you comply with the > > >> > following > > >> > limitations, you are hereby authorized to (i) use, reproduce, > > >> > and > > >> > modify the software and documentation, and to (ii) distribute > > >> > the > > >> > software and documentation, including modifications, for > > >> > non-commercial purposes only. > > >> > > > >> > 1. The enclosed software and documentation is made available at > > >> > no > > >> > charge in order to advance the general development of > > >> > high-performance networking products. > > >> > > > >> > 2. You may not delete any copyright notices contained in the > > >> > software or documentation. All hard copies, and copies in > > >> > source code or object code form, of the software or > > >> > documentation (including modifications) must contain at > > >> > least > > >> > one of the copyright notices. > > >> > > > >> > 3. The enclosed software and documentation has not been > > >> > subjected > > >> > to testing and quality control and is not a Hewlett-Packard Co. > > >> > product. At a future time, Hewlett-Packard Co. may or may > > >> > not > > >> > offer a version of the software and documentation as a product. > > >> > > > >> > 4. THE SOFTWARE AND DOCUMENTATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS". > > >> > HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE USE, > > >> > REPRODUCTION, MODIFICATION OR DISTRIBUTION OF THE SOFTWARE > > >> > OR > > >> > DOCUMENTATION WILL NOT INFRINGE A THIRD PARTY'S INTELLECTUAL > > >> > PROPERTY RIGHTS. HP DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE SOFTWARE OR > > >> > DOCUMENTATION IS ERROR FREE. HP DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, > > >> > EXPRESS AND IMPLIED, WITH REGARD TO THE SOFTWARE AND THE > > >> > DOCUMENTATION. HP SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OF > > >> > MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > > >> > > > >> > 5. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY WILL NOT IN ANY EVENT BE LIABLE FOR > > >> > ANY > > >> > DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL > > >> > DAMAGES > > >> > (INCLUDING LOST PROFITS) RELATED TO ANY USE, REPRODUCTION, > > >> > MODIFICATION, OR DISTRIBUTION OF THE SOFTWARE OR DOCUMENTATION. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Best Regards, > > >> > > > >> > Zhenhua > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Openembedded-devel mailing list > > >> [email protected] > > >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-de > > >> ve > > >> l > > > > > > > > > -- > > > -Khem > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Openembedded-devel mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-dev > > > el > > > > > > > > -- > > Elizabeth Flanagan > > Yocto Project > > Build and Release _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
