On Wednesday 25 January 2012 09:34:53 Philip Balister wrote: > On 01/25/2012 07:48 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > I think what most people want when they enable meta-oe in their layer > > configuration is #1, and it's probably OK to get #2 along with it. They do > > not however expect versions of toolchains, eglibc or other fairly > > fundamental bits and pieces that might cause their build to fail when > > everything worked fine just building with OE-Core (#4). Equally I expect > > there will be some people who want just #3 and nothing else. > > My understanding is the OE-Core toolchains lack the Linaro patches which > a extremely useful for people using armv7. So dropping toolchains from > meta-oe would be a really bad thing for a large portion of the user base.
I was suggesting moving these toolchains to a separate layer where those who don't need them aren't tripping over them. Adding such a layer to your configuration is more or less trivial, and once done you would not notice any difference. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
