On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 13:47, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I understand your use case but it seems in this case you ought to >> override >> > it in a bbappend. It doesn't seems right as this is the exception, not >> the >> > rule. If we don't depends on it, we can end with the binaries being not >> > available in case a rootfs generation. >> >> Which recipes really depend on systemd during build? I know about >> polkit, something else? > > > At this moment I know about polkit, I didn't check newer udev but I think > it ought to depends on it as well. > > -- > Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems > E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br > Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Unfortunately the patch has a bad side-effect: http://paste.debian.net/154741/ (I removed /systemd to show the culprit) Sadly enough freedesktop git is down, so I've been obliged to revert that patch. Andrea _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
