On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Kamble, Nitin A <[email protected]> wrote: > Ivan, > So is adding "virtual/java" in provider is enough to get the two versions of > java recipes to work interchangeably ?
look at meta-java virtual/java-native virtual/javac-native virtual/javac and work with Henning (woglinge) to sort out any other layer APIs you need these layers to live amicably > > Nitin > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kamble, Nitin A >> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 10:00 AM >> To: Khem Raj; [email protected] >> Subject: RE: [oe] Java: meta-java, meta-oracle-java >> >> > On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Ivan Kuten <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > I meant isn't it going to be something like that in local.conf : >> > > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/java = "oracle-jre" >> > > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/java = "openjdk" >> > > in a single meta-java layer... >> > >> > I think that would be sensible meta-java e.g. do provide >> > virtuals I hope oracle java layer does something same. >> > > >> > > Regards, >> > > Ivan >> > > >> > > On 02/04/2012 05:21 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >> > >> On (04/02/12 02:05), Ivan Kuten wrote: >> > >>> Hello, >> > >>> >> > >>> I noticed an activity around meta-java layer (OpenJDK based) >> > >>> https://github.com/woglinde/meta-java >> > >>> and recently around Oracle JRE: >> > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-oracle-java/ >> > >>> >> > >>> Any plans to combine or coordinate these efforts? >> > >> these are two different layers so they will exist. What >> coordination >> > >> would you like to see that will help you >> >> I agree, adding virtual/java in provides is a good thing for end user, >> and I will do it in the oracle-java recipes. >> And because of license differences it is better to keep these 2 >> variations of java recipes in different layers. >> >> Nitin _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
