On 08.02.2012 20:48, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 17:35, Andreas Oberritter <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I already explained in the commit message, why a PR bump is not needed. >> Can you please explain which other possible failures you're expecting, >> so I can learn why my reasoning may be wrong? >> >> This patch only fixes an unavailable build dependency at bitbake level, >> nothing more. >> > > Can the user call: > > bitbake libsm > > and then build giflib? in case of positive, we need to enforce have or not > it linked.
At the time I created the patch, the user couldn't run bitbake libsm (for the same reason that it wouldn't be built automatically through giflib's DEPENDS). That said, I updated the repos after your mail and ran bitbake libsm in order to get the error message again, but the error vanished. Apparently, an indirect dependency on libx11 was dropped during the last few weeks. I searched the logs, but didn't find the change. Strange. Now, many x11 packages got built even though x11 still wasn't listed in my DISTRO_FEATURES. Anyway, please consider this patch obsolete. I'll probably resend an updated version together with other patches to disable some more x11 libraries on demand. Regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
