On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Andreas Müller
<schnitzelt...@googlemail.com> wrote:
Apart from the NAKed distro setting and automatic DEPENDS - are there
comments on the other:
let systemd.bbclass do more for us
>
> * handle multiple entries in SYSTEMD_SERVICE. Currenly there are no use cases
> but networkmanager has potential requirements
> * handle multiple entries in SYSTEMD_PACKAGES. Possible use cases are
> dhcp/dhcp-relay and ntp/ntpdate
> * enhance the checks for SYSTEMD_PACKAGES and SYSTEMD_SERVICE. For package
> names only <name-of-an-existing-package>-systemd or ${PN} are allowed. In
> case of using ${PN} a warning is spitted. This was introduced to force recipe
> maintainers to separate out systemd to own package.
> * all systemd packages are automatically created based on SYSTEMD_PACKAGES
* for systemd packets automatically add RDEPENDS to base packages
> * all *.socket and *.service files included by SRC_URI are automatically
> installed from WORKDIR.
would it make sense to split this up and resend?
Andreas
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
