On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 08:43, Andreas Müller > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> As far as I can see there is no link from *.socket to *.service ( >> *.service requires *.socket) - correct?. Interesting: This was >> highlighted by the systemd.bbclass modification: without this patch >> *.service is not installed. Is there something I have overseen? > > > As you can see at > http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.socket.html if > Accept is false, then a <service>.service needs to exist, if Accept is > true, then <service>@.service needs to exist. > > -- OK - but is it a problem to choose *.service? Will systemd-sysctl-native do the expected job?
Andreas _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
