Ышщыпжищащщщввцшшйкгкушукщщзу 17.02.2012 22:54 пользователь "Andreas Müller" <[email protected]> написал:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 03:02:54AM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote: > >> V1 -> V2: > >> [2] do not check configuration variables for cross and nativesdk > >> [3] rename systemd_package to systemd_generate_package_scripts > >> [6] parse unit files to determine the files to pack > >> [7] create warning if *-systemd package already rdepends > >> it's base package > >> added in V2: > >> [8]-[20] remove obsolet systemd code from recipes (these were used as > >> test cases) > >> [21] dhcp-(relay) test case for multiple systemd packages > >> [22] modified to start service > > > > Whole series looks good to me sofar. > > > > I'm not sure what's meant by this warning: > > WARNING: > > /OE/shr-core/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/gateone/ > gateone_git.bb: > > it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd > > WARNING: > > /OE/shr-core/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/cloud9/ > cloud9_0.5.1.bb: > > it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd > > > > I guess we should > > -SYSTEMD_PACKAGES = "${PN}" > > +SYSTEMD_PACKAGES = "${PN}-systemd" > > with this patchset too and add ${PN}-systemd to task which pulls > gateone/cloud9. > > > > And I'm not sure if this change is intentional: > > > http://git.shr-project.org/git/?p=buildhistory.git;a=commitdiff;h=3d27d7267406bd0fb2ea2a48b108dbb8bc7c128f#patch18 > > > > as xserver-nodm-init-systemd doesn't really need xserver-nodm-init, but > > probably won't harm if xserver-nodm-init is used only to pull > > xinit+xserver-common dependency. > > > The only 'clean' way out here I see is an additional variable > overriding automatic rdepending. How about > > SYSTEMD_RDEPENDS: If this variable is set with a list of packages, its > contents are used for redepending (systemd is still added). It should > be possible to set packages outside of recipe and of course the > contents should be checked during parse. What do you think? > > Andreas > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
