That said, I do believe you ought to check if your changes cannot be made
generic
Will try to keep in mind.
Please complain at them ... this is the only way to revert it.
I'll keep on at them :) Anything not to have to go back to LTIB... ;)
Alex
On 15/03/2012 17:21, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 14:16, Alex J Lennon
<[email protected]> wrote:
I think the first solution is better and that custom boards should be added
to custom layers
Hmmm ok, thanks That being the case it may be better for me to migrate my
recipes from
the oe-classic codebase into a new layer created from scratch. It'll be
quicker and easier for
me that way but perhaps less generic.
I think many things can be merged back but it is better to have custom
boards in specific layers that inherit meta-fsl-arm. That said, I do
believe you ought to check if your changes cannot be made generic
(ofthenly it can be done) and this could allow it to be merged here.
(Although my understanding was that Freescale have no intention of providing
Linux support related
to OpenEmbedded at this time? Or at least that's what they are telling me
:)
Please complain at them ... this is the only way to revert it. Some
individuals are working with OpenEmbedded/Yocto and it might end
changing the Freescale's position if we can enough community support
and complains at them :-)
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
