On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks <[email protected]> wrote: > 2012/3/20 Steffen Sledz <[email protected]>: >> On 19.03.2012 17:21, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 04:44:10PM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >>>> 2012/3/19 Tom Rini <[email protected]>: >>>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Steffen Sledz <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On 15.03.2012 11:32, Steffen Sledz wrote: >>>>>>> libmatthew-java-0.7.1.tar.gz (used in 2011.03-maintenance branch) is no >>>>>>> longer fetchable from it's original location (the maintainer provides >>>>>>> the latests version only). And i did not found another reliable source. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can someone put the tarball into the OE and/or Angstrom mirrors? >>>>>> >>>>>> Ping! >>>>> >>>>> If someone points Khem at a copy, this can happen... >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> google is your friend >>>> >>>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/libmatthew-java/libmatthew-java-0.7.1.tar.gz/6a4db221129f230c64a0f937d00bb703/libmatthew-java-0.7.1.tar.gz >>>> >>>> It might be useful to update the recipe itself as well. >>>> Furthermore we might consider running a fetchall and put all fetched >>>> on the mirror. >>> >>> Does pkgs.fedoraproject.org have a policy about forever, ala >>> snapshot.debian.org? Otherwise, we're just making a problem for >>> ourselves in the future. WRT an everything mirror, I think bandwidth >>> usage is a concern there, ala what I think happened with the angstrom >>> everything mirror. > > I don't know about the policy fedora has for retaining packages. > There might also be a copy on debian. Google gave a fair number of hits.
I see one under http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20110301/pool/main/libm/libmatthew-java/ so a patch to switch to that would be good with me. -- Tom _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
