On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:12:08AM +0100, Eric Bénard wrote: > Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:07:58 +0100, > Martin Jansa <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:01:39AM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <[email protected]> > > > > Why not move them? > > > > Or create stub of meta-toolchain in 1st patch for people to add it to > > bblayers and then move it in 2nd. > > > > If it was copied just that people doesn't have to > > update bblayers at the same time as git pull from meta-oe. > > > I think the next step is a patch removing them from meta-oe to make > the change less intrusive than a one shot move and give people the > time to update their bblayers.conf.
yup that's why I proposed to create empty, but valid meta-toolchain stub so people can add it to bblayers.conf now and later we can populate it by git move with whatever we decide we want :). Cheers, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
