On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 03:45:19PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:52:15AM +0200, Andrea Adami wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > * notice that ARM_KEEP_OABI default value is now 0 instead of 1 > > > but only linux-hackndev and linux-handhelds-2.6-2.6.21 had > > > CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT=y in defconfigs so this shouldn't change anything > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > > Martin, > > > > I have some concerns here, because I don't think meta-handeld should > > depend on meta-oe. > > (I know udev .bbappend requires it now but talking with Paul we found > > a better solution and udev will disappear from layer soon). > > Denis wanted linux.inc also in some smaller layer then meta-oe, so maybe > we can create meta-bsp-support in meta-opememebedded repository and move > it there? > > Having linux.inc copy for each BSP is wrong.
Remind me, what was the reason to have linux.inc as a separate file in the first place? I mean, can we roll it back to kernel.bbclass in OE-Core? If not, maybe it would be easier to push it as is to OE-Core, since it's much cleaner now? -- Denys _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel