On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Koen Kooi <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Op 17-05-12 15:07, Andreas Müller schreef: >> Hi >> >> happy to see this happen I have few questions on what is planned. >> >> In README is written: >> >>> And we're working to break the dependency on this one: >>> >>> URI: git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded >> >> Maybe it is a misunderstanding but I would expect for contents of this >> layer >> >> * systemd.bbclass * all from meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd * bbappends for >> all recipes with systemd support. >> >> Is this correct? > > Correct. The bbappends will likely cause dependencies on non-oecore layers, > but so be it. We might need to set the unbreak-me flag for missing bb files > that match our bbappends. > Unless people actually start reporting the bugs they encounter by including > meta-oe... Two more questions:
1. Has anybody patches in queue to fill meta-systemd? If not I would stand up to prepare some. 2. Any complaints against the original idea to RRECOMMEND *-systemd package as suggested [1] to avoid *-systemd packages in tasks/images. AFAICR this was NAKed because a distro-var was necessary. Andreas [1] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2012-February/037750.html _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
