On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 05:15:33PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Friday 13 July 2012 18:03:08 Koen Kooi wrote:
> > Op 13 jul. 2012, om 17:58 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
> > > On Thursday 12 July 2012 15:57:52 Joe MacDonald wrote:
> > >> Just to make sure we're got it in context, though, the open points were:
> > >> - tcpdump listed in meta-oe's recipes-core/tasks/task-cli-tools,
> > >>
> > >> under RDEPENDS_${PN}-debug.
> > >
> > > Koen, any suggestions? This task has pretty random contents - some of it
> > > is even hardware-specific. Do we really need to keep this together?
> >
> > That's an SHR recipe, you'd have to ask Martin Jansa.
>
> Ultimately we should not have anything distro-specific in meta-oe at all,
> which
> means we all ought to have a say in its contents - otherwise it belongs in
> the
> distro layer.It was added from oe-core, because we (SHR) were still using it in our images/tasks. If we're the only one user I don't mind moving it to our distro layer or reworking it to something usefull for other people too. > Martin, do you have any objection to this task recipe being reworked in the > face of the proposal to split tcpdump (and other networking-related recipes) > out to meta-networking? Not at all.. I'll just add meta-networking to our layers setup.. > > The biggest blocker right now is where meta-networking is going to be > > hosted, the layers in the meta-openembedded repo can only depend on oe-core > > and bitbake, no other external layers. > > I'll leave this for Joe to comment on. Cheers, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
