Op 3 okt. 2012, om 14:23 heeft Paul Eggleton <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven:
> On Wednesday 03 October 2012 13:43:30 Koen Kooi wrote: >> Op 3 okt. 2012, om 13:29 heeft Paul Eggleton <[email protected]> > het volgende geschreven: >>> On Wednesday 03 October 2012 13:27:41 Koen Kooi wrote: >>>> Op 3 okt. 2012 om 12:43 heeft Paul Eggleton >>>> <[email protected]> >>> >>> het volgende geschreven: >>>>> On Wednesday 03 October 2012 12:24:19 Koen Kooi wrote: >>>>>> Squash those "import" with the "fix" commits, no sense in having a >>>>>> broken >>>>>> recipe in there. >>>>> >>>>> I'd rather not - there is sense in being clear about the changes, >>>>> because >>>>> there are a large number of them in this case. >>>> >>>> The broken recipes are still available in OE classic if people want to >>>> compare them. I still don't get why you want to have broken recipes in >>>> the >>>> tree at multiple points in your series. >>> >>> Because I want to easily see in "git blame" where particular lines came >>> from - did I add them, or have they been around for ages? >> >> Does oe-core have the same flow for new recipes? > > You already know the answer to this. No I don't, actually. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
