On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 09:59:19AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Monday 22 October 2012 09:25:45 Khem Raj wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Paul Eggleton > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Friday 19 October 2012 16:37:19 Khem Raj wrote: > > >> If you dont use patchwork dont bother but if you do then it had some > > >> hiccups which now has been fixed hopefully. So if you dont see your > > >> latest patch on patchwork resend it. > > > > > > I just sent my hddtemp patch for the third time and it still hasn't been > > > picked up by patchwork, so I'm afraid something is still not working > > > properly. > > > > we have always had issue with large patches. I dont know exact size but > > pw did not parse large emails well. I wonder if your patch is large enough > > to cross the bar. > > I've just posted v2 of the patch which is less than half the size, still no > dice though. > > However, one unusual thing about this patch (and the previous version) is > that > git send-email did prompt me for an encoding, I used the default (UTF-8); > even > the subject line is encoded. Maybe patchwork doesn't understand UTF-8 - could > that be the reason it's not being picked up?
Well, if your patch got uuencoded or base64-encoded, I'd say patchwork might choke on it... -- Denys _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
